Examining what Rolex wanted from its in-house developed chronograph, starting with the Cal. 4130 movement

2024.06.03

Rolex is a manufacturer of practical watches that boasts high technical capabilities and is known for its solid designs. For a long time, Rolex used ébauche movements for its chronographs. The tide turned when they announced their own in-house developed chronograph movements in 2000. We will examine what they wanted from their in-house developed chronographs, starting with the movement.

Cal. 4130

Photographs by Yu Mitamura
Interview and text by Yukiya Suzuki (Chronos-Japan)
Special thanks to ZENMAIWORKS
[Article published in the July 2020 issue of Kronos Japan]


Cal.4130 research

Cal. 4130

With the case back removed, the automatic winding rotor and rotor bridge are removed, revealing the chronograph wheel train bridge with the caliber number "4130" engraved on the left side.

 Caliber 4130, Rolex's first in-house developed chronograph movement, was released in 2000. Automatic winding and a vertical clutch are now considered the standard for modern chronographs, but considering that many watchmakers began releasing chronographs with this specification one after another from the mid-2000s onwards, Rolex was undoubtedly a pioneer. However, as watch journalist Gisbert L. Brunner writes, "The development of this movement did not go smoothly at first. "At first, they considered using the Caliber 1185, an automatic chronograph from Frederic Piguet with three horizontal subdials, like the Daytona. Although this was later approved, at the time it was only possible to supply this movement to Blancpain."

 Since they could not use Frédéric Piguet's 1185, they had no choice but to develop it themselves. Marc Schmidt and Michel Santé were the core of the development team.

Bruner's assessment of them is that "They are a generation that did not experience the glory of the golden age of the chronograph, but they have succeeded in looking ahead to the 21st century." Perhaps it was precisely because they had no experience of the good old days of the chronograph that they were able to break free from the yoke of the horizontal clutch based on the Zenith El Primero that they had been using until then, and step into the new realm of vertical clutch.

Cal. 4130

When the chronograph gear train bridge is removed, the distinctively shaped reset hammer can be seen. A spring-loaded hammer is attached to the center of the U-shaped hammer to reset the offset vertical clutch.

 The biggest difference between the previous-generation Caliber 4030 used in the Daytona and the current-generation 4130 is the clutch. Although Seiko was unable to adopt the 1185, the vertical clutch of the 4130, which they developed themselves, was also different from that of the 1185. Please take a close look at the movement photo. Like the Caliber 6139 released by Seiko in 1969, a normal vertical clutch is based on a center-seconds train movement, with a friction wheel placed on the centrally located fourth wheel. However, with the 4130, the small seconds hand is located at 6 o'clock, so the vertical clutch cannot be placed in the center.

Cal. 4130

The U-shaped hammer has been removed. The entire chronograph gear train is now clearly visible, including the vertical clutch offset to the 6 o'clock position. Of particular note is the central seconds chronograph wheel manufactured by LIGA. Its spring properties absorb shocks when starting and stopping the chronograph, stabilizing the chronograph seconds hand.

 Their solution was to incorporate a vertical clutch into the fourth wheel at 6 o'clock. By stacking the clutch on the offset fourth wheel, not only did they reduce the thickness of the movement, but they also enabled the small seconds hand to be positioned properly, without cross-eyes, despite the movement's large 30.5mm diameter. However, Rolex is known for its solid design, so this is hardly an afterthought. Placing the second wheel in the center, rather than the fourth wheel, would have made the minute hand less likely to jump when setting the time. Perhaps Rolex was trying to introduce a vertical clutch that would increase safety while also preventing the chronograph seconds hand from jumping. The LIGA gear was later adopted to further reduce jumping.

Bidirectional winding reverser

Cal. 4130 uses a bidirectional winding reverser. The automatic winding mechanism has a modular structure, and the entire module can be removed as shown in the photo above. It is said to have improved winding efficiency compared to Cal. 4030. The rotor of Cal. 4130 is thinner than Cal. 4030, but the rotor pinion is thicker, demonstrating that it is both thin and robust.

 When it was first released, this off-center vertical clutch was undoubtedly a challenge. Chopard's LUC10CF, released in 2006, also had an off-center vertical clutch, and like the 4130, it placed the vertical clutch near the column wheel, achieving stable control and operability. Six years before the LUC10CF, which is characterized by its robust construction, Rolex had already adopted a vertical clutch in a different way from the 1185, while also aiming for robustness.

Oyster Perpetual Cosmograph Daytona

The movement we tested this time was the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Cosmograph Daytona, Ref. 116520, on the right. Automatic (Cal. 4130). 44 jewels. 28,800 vph. Power reserve approximately 72 hours. Stainless steel case (diameter 40mm). Water resistant to 100m. On the left is the Ref. 116500LN. Automatic (Cal. 4130). 44 jewels. 28,800 vph. Power reserve approximately 72 hours. Equipped with a ceramic bezel. Stainless steel case (diameter 40mm). Water resistant to 100m.


[For watch enthusiasts] Understanding the evolution of modern chronographs through historical movements

http://www.webchronos.net/features/115481/
Rolex Daytona gets an update! The new 60th anniversary model is understated but amazing!!!

http://www.webchronos.net/features/92968/
Rolex "Oyster Perpetual Cosmograph Daytona" / Dictionary of watch names

http://www.webchronos.net/features/38345/